#506 closed enhancement (fixed)
svndigest does not build with subversion 1.7
Reported by: | Peter Johansson | Owned by: | Peter Johansson |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | svndigest 0.9.4 |
Component: | build | Version: | trunk |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
This is a spin-off from
http://dev.thep.lu.se/svndigest/ticket/488#comment:6
Regardless of direction of ticket #488 I want to fix this build problem asap, i.e., fix it in stable, release, and merge fix into trunk. I want this to work automagically so ./configure; make
works without tweaking from user.
To accomplish this we need to turn off -pedantic when subversion 1.7 is used. I'm thinking of a solution in which we set -pedantic early just as now, then when we have confirmed that we can find svn headers we check compiling against svn_wc.h and if that is not successful we remove -pedantic from CXXFLAGS.
Change History (7)
comment:1 follow-up: 3 Changed 12 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by
Are you saying turn on -pedantic in --enable-debug and not otherwise?
That's a much more straightforward change than the one I sketched on.
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by
Replying to jari:
Reading this thread in the svndigest mailing list makes me wonder. Shouldn't
-pedantic
accept the trailing komma?
Well it seems trailing comma is OK in C99 but illegal in C89 and C++98 [1]. Naively it makes sense that -pedantic checks with C++98 since we use gcc in C++ mode. The subversion header is obviously written in C and I'm thinking this should be clear to GCC as there is an extern C declaration. Should GCC switch pedantic to check against C99 in this case?
[1] http://bytes.com/topic/c/answers/805031-trailing-commas-end-enumeration
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by
Isn't this a bug in GCC? Shouldn't g++ accept the commas since it is legal C? Can one expect a C++ compiler to follow a C standard in extern C clauses? Of course, here we cannot expect a C++98 standard to utilize C99 (a future standard) so I suppose the g++ does a proper job. So, what about the coming C++ standard? Whatever, go for the straightforward solution.
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Reading this thread in the svndigest mailing list makes me wonder. Shouldn't
-pedantic
accept the trailing komma? Obviously it is allowed in the standard ... of course, pedantic does not have to settle to check allowed syntax.So, -pedantic is not a part of debugging and seems to be too restrictive. Maybe it should be an option selected by the developer and off by default?