Changeset 841 for branches/0.3.1/test

Timestamp:

Apr 25, 2007, 10:20:54 AM (16 years ago)

Author:

Jari Häkkinen

Message:

Addresses #222. Comparing doubles with == is poor programming style.

File:

• branches/0.3.1/test/regression_test.cc (modified) (3 diffs)

branches/0.3.1/test/regression_test.cc

@@ -267 +267 @@
   r.fit(x,y);
   rw.fit(x,y,w);
-  if (r.predict(2000) != rw.predict(2000)){
+  if (fabs(r.predict(2000) - rw.predict(2000))>1e-15) {
     ok = false;
     *error << "Error: predict not equal\n" 
@@ -382 +382 @@
 
   wr.fit(x2,y2,w2);
-  if (wr.predict(2000) != predict){
+  if (fabs(wr.predict(2000) - predict)>1e-15) {
     ok = false;
     *error << "Error: predict not equal.\n";
   }
-  if (wr.prediction_error2(2000) != prediction_error2){
+  if (fabs(wr.prediction_error2(2000) - prediction_error2)>1e-13) {
     ok = false;
     *error << "Error: prediction_error2 not equal.\n";
   }
-  if (wr.r2() != r2){
+  if (fabs(wr.r2() - r2)>1e-15) {
     ok = false;
     *error << "Error: r2 not equal.\n";
@@ -396 +396 @@
     *error << "   r2: " << wr.r2() << "\n";
   }
-  if (wr.s2() != s2){
+  if (fabs(wr.s2() - s2)>1e-15) {
     ok = false;
     *error << "Error: s2 not equal.\n";
   }
-  if (wr.standard_error2(2000) != standard_error2){
+  if (fabs(wr.standard_error2(2000) - standard_error2)>1e-15) {
     ok = false;
     *error << "Error: standard_error2 not equal.\n";