Opened 17 years ago

Closed 17 years ago

#206 closed enhancement (fixed)

is matrix:set(const matrix&) needed?

Reported by: Peter Owned by: Jari Häkkinen
Priority: major Milestone: yat 0.3 (Public release)
Component: utility Version:
Keywords: Cc:

Description (last modified by Jari Häkkinen)

Since the new implementation of assignment operator, I wonder if set function really is needed. If it is not needed I think it should be removed. This issue applies also to vector class.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 17 years ago by Peter

Component: classifierutility
Owner: changed from Markus Ringnér to Peter

comment:2 Changed 17 years ago by Jari Häkkinen

Description: modified (diff)

Remove the set() function, also change name on the set_* functions, i.e., remove set_ where appropriate. Also, update documentation to explicitly say that the functions are convenience functions and also add a sample of how to do it using views.

comment:3 Changed 17 years ago by Jari Häkkinen

Owner: changed from Peter to Jari Häkkinen
Status: newassigned

comment:4 Changed 17 years ago by Jari Häkkinen

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

(In [830]) Fixes #206.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.